Black Forest Labs компанийн Flux 3 загвар өнгөрсөн зууны хүүхдүүдийн дүрс бичлэгийг үнэмшилтэйгээр дуурайж чаддагийг мэргэжилтнүүд онцоллоо.
Өнгөрсөн долоо хоногт Andreessen Horowitz венчур капитал компанийн түнш Жастин Мур Black Forest Labs компанийн бүтээсэн Flux 3 загварын тусламжтайгаар 1990-ээд оны сурагчдын дүрийг сэргээсэн бичлэгийг олон нийтийн сүлжээнд хуваалцжээ. Тус венчур капитал компани 2024 онд Black Forest Labs компанид хөрөнгө оруулалт хийсэн бөгөөд Flux 3 загвар нь түүхэн архивын дүрс бичлэгийг гаргахад онцгой сайн үр дүнтэй болохыг тэрбээр тэмдэглэв. Тус видео нь 1990-ээд оны дүрсний чанар, хувцаслалт, хүүхдүүдийн яриаг тун бодитоор харуулсан байна.
Видео бичлэгт хиймэл оюун ухаанаар бүтээгдсэн хүүхдүүд компьютер бидний гэрийн даалгаврыг хийж, кино бүтээх талаар ярилцаж байгаа нь 20-р зуунд хүүхдүүдийн дэвшүүлж байсан таамаглалтай яг ижилхэн байна. Энэ нь хиймэл оюун ухааны хэрэгслийг сурталчлах зорилготой байж болох ч цаашид түүхэн үйл явдлыг гуйвуулах, хуурамч бичлэг бүтээхэд ашиглагдах эрсдэлтэйг мэргэжилтнүүд анхаарууллаа. Тухайлбал, 2001 оны есдүгээр сарын 11-ний халдлага эсвэл улс төрийн түүхэн үйл явдлуудын талаарх хуурамч бичлэгийг үнэн мэт итгүүлэх аюул нүүрлэж байна.
Өдгөө технологи хөгжихийн хэрээр хүмүүс бодит баримт болон хуурамч контентыг ялгахаа больж, улмаар үнэн бодит гэрэл зураг, бичлэгийг ч үгүйсгэх хандлага гарах болжээ. Тухайлбал, алдартай бейсболч Бэйб Рут уг нь оршин байгаагүй гэж маргах эсвэл улс төрчид бодит бичлэгийг хиймэл оюун ухаанаар бүтээсэн гэж гүтгэх боломжийг олгодог “худалч хүний ногдол ашиг” хэмээх үзэгдэл газар авч байна. Иймд технологийн хөгжлийн энэ эрин үед хүмүүс мэдээ мэдээллийг шүүлтүүртэйгээр хүлээн авч, зохих эргэлзээтэйгээр хандах шаардлагатай болж байна.
Дэлгэрэнгүйг эх сурвалжаас харах
Эх сурвалжийг нээх ↓
Did you recently see a video of kids from the 1990s predicting how computers would be used in the future? It’s fake. The video was created using Flux 3 and if you didn’t inspect it too closely, it looks pretty authentic as an artifact from 30 years ago. But it serves as a great reminder that we really can’t trust our own eyes here in 2026.
Justine Moore, a partner at venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, tweeted the video last week, writing that Black Forest Labs’ Flux 3 is “exceptional at generating historical footage.” The venture capital firm announced it was investing in Black Forest Labs in 2024.
Moore noted that the last girl in the video was her favorite, perhaps because it has some awkward silences that make it appear much more realistic.
Turns out that Flux 3 is exceptional at generating historical footage…
like elementary school students in the ’90s predicting how we’ll use computers.
(the last girl is my favorite!) pic.twitter.com/oH6qJy8AQU
— Justine Moore (@venturetwins) July 28, 2026
The video has an aesthetic quality that feels like 1990s video and the outfits are decade appropriate. The answers given by the AI kids are also very believable. “They’ll probably do our homework,” one AI-generated kid says. Another responds, “Maybe they’ll make movies for us,” an obvious nod to the agenda of tech boosters who think AI tools will soon replace Hollywood films.
“I think we’ll just tell them what to do,” another fake AI kid says in the video. That one feels like a wink to folks who are worried about AI going rogue. OpenAI and Anthropic have had some experience with that lately.
These kinds of predictions were extremely common in the 20th century. Kids frequently predicted that computers (or robots) would do their homework for them. A few years back I looked at some predictions for robots in the future from kids in the 1980s and they sounded identical.
“I want my robot to do things for my mom and me. I want my robot to do my homework,” one Kentucky first grader in 1988 wrote.
Kids were predicting thesame kind of stuff as far back as the 1950s. So it’s clear where the creators of this video were pulling this idea from. But the video presents a unique challenge for the future of humanity.
What happens when people make realistic AI videos that change how we understand history? Obviously this one is fairly innocuous, even if the goal is to normalize AI use through subtle propaganda. But what about people who create new versions of events in history and treat them like newly uncovered video? Perhaps we get an AI-generated wide angle view of the airplane that crashed into the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. Or maybe we get a new angle on the assassination of John F. Kennedy that reveals the president was actually killed by Tiny Tim?
This is just the world we live in now. And we have to navigate it with proper skepticism. Unfortunately, people can be so skeptical that they discount very real photos and videos. Have you heard that some pro baseball players have started to insist Babe Ruth didn’t actually exist? The evidence for this claim is that apparently there isn’t enough video footage of the late baseball great. But it’s a ridiculous idea for so many reasons, not least of which is that we actually have a fair amount of motion picture film showing Babe Ruth in action.
President Donald Trump benefits from the same kind of skepticism in a perverse way. It’s known as the liar’s dividend, where someone can claim that real footage is fake because there’s enough doubt based on the available technology to create a plausible fake video.
I’m not saying that Tiny Tim actually killed Kennedy. I’m just saying that if he really did and there was video proving it, nobody would believe it’s real. And if someone made a fake AI video showing Tiny Tim killing Kennedy there would be people who absolutely think it’s real.
In short, we’re just cooked as a species at this point.
