Цахим худалдааны SEO чиглэлээр үйл ажиллагаа явуулдаг Productrise компанийн судалгаагаар Google-ийн хиймэл оюун ухааны (AI) горим нь уламжлалт хайлтын системээс дунджаар 21.6 хувиар илүү үнэтэй бүтээгдэхүүнийг санал болгож байна.
Өнгөрсөн сард Google компани нүүр хуудсандаа хиймэл оюун ухааны шинэ функцуудыг нэвтрүүлсэн. Судалгаагаар AI горимд гарч ирж буй бараа бүтээгдэхүүний жагсаалт нь уламжлалт хайлтын үр дүнгээс 49 хувиар илүү харагдацтай байрлалд байршиж байгаа нь хэрэглэгчдийн сонголтод нөлөөлж болзошгүйг харуулжээ. Түүнчлэн хоёр төрлийн хайлтын үр дүнд гарч ирэх худалдагч талууд 50 орчим хувиар зөрүүтэй байгаа нь AI горим нь төсөвт ээлтэй бус худалдагчдыг илүүд үзэж байж болзошгүй гэсэн таамаг дэвшүүлж байна.
Google компани энэ талаар тайлбар өгөхдөө, бүх хайлтын үр дүн нь “Shopping Graph” хэмээх ижил мэдээллийн эх сурвалжаас бүрддэг болохыг мэдэгдсэн. Хэдийгээр тус компани үнийн зөрүүний талаарх мэдээллийн үнэн зөвийг баталгаажуулаагүй ч, хэрэглэгчид бүтээгдэхүүнийг хялбархан товшиж, өөр өөр худалдагчдын үнийг харьцуулах боломжтой гэдгийг онцолсон юм.
Шинжээчдийн дүгнэж буйгаар, хиймэл оюун ухаан нь худалдан авалтыг хөнгөвчлөх ёстой байтал илүү өндөр үнэтэй барааг эхэнд гаргаж ирж байгаа нь хэрэглэгчдийн хүлээлтэд нийцэхгүй байна. Судалгаанд оролцогчдын ихэнх нь хамгийн хямд үнийг олохын тулд AI-ийн санал болгосон үр дүнг алгасан уламжлалт хайлтын арга руу ханддаг болохыг тогтоожээ.
Дэлгэрэнгүйг эх сурвалжаас харах
↓Эх сурвалжийг нээх ↓
Last month, Google updated its home page to replace its iconic “Search” button with various AI features.
The move was the latest sign of the tech giant succumbing to the draw of AI that remains deeply flawed — and the staggering amount of misinformation that comes along with it.
Even the experience of shopping online is starting to look dramatically different, and consumers may be paying the price. According to a recent experiment by e-commerce SEO company Productrise, the same exact products are showing up as 21.6 percent more expensive on average in Google AI Mode compared to a traditional search.
It’s a thorny topic as lawmakers ponder whether to intervene as companies are increasingly using AI tools to analyze consumers’ personal data to tailor price tags in real time, a controversial practice called “surveillance pricing.” While Productrise’s experiment doesn’t necessarily prove that Google is discriminating on price by using the wealth of data it has on users, the discrepancy raises plenty of questions over how AI Mode arrives at its recommendations — and why prices appear to differ compared to regular search.
“While we haven’t verified the accuracy of the claims in this report, all shopping results on Google Search, including AI Mode and the search results page, are powered by the same data source: our Shopping Graph,” Google told us. “Shoppers can easily click into a product listing to compare prices for that product across retailers and choose the best option for them.”
Beyond showing a higher price for the same exact product, the study also found that AI Mode listings are far more visible to users, sitting “49 percent higher than traditional search listings.” The primary vendor for the same exact product differed just under 50 percent of the time between the two modes, suggesting AI Mode is prioritizing a strikingly different — and less budget-oriented — group of sellers.
“This is a fascinating study that reveals more about Google’s Shopping Graph and the inconsistencies between classic search and AI Mode for free listing placements,” said independent SEO consultant Brodie Clark in a statement shared by Productrise.
However, whether consumers are actually willing to pay those higher prices is a different matter. Many, the research found, are clicking past the AI feature to find the actual best value.
“While the higher price might be displayed within the grid result in AI Mode (making the top-level comparison less accurate), what we tend to see is that the retailer with the lowest price gets the click in the end,” Clark explained.
The findings suggest a given product’s price may not be given “as much weighting as we would have expected,” he argued, when AI Mode is recommending what to buy.
When searching for products using prompts like “metal bidet attachment” or “manual grinder stainless steel,” Productrise found that recommendations inside AI Mode for the same product listed in traditional Google searches were consistently more expensive.
In addition, only 1.28 percent of products the company analyzed appeared in both traditional search and AI mode “for the same search on the same day,” indicating that it’s relatively rare for recommendations to overlap. And when they did overlap, the actual seller differed 49.6 percent of the time, Productrise found.
Nonetheless, the higher prices undermine claims that AI is meant to “make shopping easier,” as Google put in an April press release. Much like the journalism injury, which is suffering from Google discouraging users from clicking on links with its AI Overview feature, advertisers are struggling to control the shopping experience and how products are being featured inside AI Mode.
“AI search was supposed to eliminate the friction of comparing prices across five different tabs, but if it only serves pricier inventory by default, it hasn’t saved us any work,” said senior SEO strategist Katelyn Geary in the statement.
More on AI and Google: Google AI Giving Staggeringly Racist “Advice” About Being Alone With Certain Groups of People
The post Google’s AI Mode Is Ripping Shoppers Off With Vastly Higher Prices, Study Claims appeared first on Futurism.
