Адди Османи хиймэл оюуны код бичих агент ашиглахыг эсэргүүцээгүй ч үр дүнг нягталж, эцсийн хариуцлагыг хүн хүлээх ёстой гэжээ.
Anthropic-ийн инженер Адди Османи хиймэл оюуны агентуудад өдөр тутмын ажил, тэр дундаа код бичих ажлаа хэт даатгавал шүүмжлэлт сэтгэлгээ болон бусад чухал чадвараа алдах эрсдэлтэй гэж анхааруулжээ. Түүний хэлснээр, тогтмол ашиглахгүй болсон ур чадвар төсөөлснөөс хурдан суларч болно.
Османи хиймэл оюуны агент ашиглахыг эсэргүүцээгүй ч гаргасан үр дүнг шууд зөвшөөрөхөөс зайлсхийж, шүүмжлэлт сэтгэлгээгээ хадгалах нь чухал гэжээ. Хиймэл оюун хэр их тусалсан ч эцсийн хариуцлагыг хүн хүлээх ёстой гэж тэр онцолсон.
https://t.co/2gyp2ErpxxNovember 3, 2026
Түүний үзэж буйгаар, ажлын зарим хэсгийг хиймэл оюунд даатгаж болох ч үр дүнг хянаж, эзэн нь байх үүрэг хүнээс хэвээр үлдэнэ. Хариултыг эхэндээ нягталж уншаад, дараа нь гүйлгэж харан, эцэст нь кодын мөрийг тайлбарлаж чадахгүй болох нь танин мэдэхүйн “өр” хуримтлагдаж буй хэрэг гэж Османи тайлбарлажээ.
Үүнээс сэргийлэхийн тулд суурь чадвараа тогтмол ашиглах, хиймэл оюунд хандахаас өмнө санаагаа боловсруулах, гаргасан үр дүнг анхааралтай шалгахыг тэр зөвлөсөн байна. Мөн хиймэл оюуны гаргасан шийдвэрийг ойлгож, ямар чадвараа түүнд даатгахаа ухамсартай сонгох хэрэгтэй гэжээ.
Дэлгэрэнгүйг эх сурвалжаас харах
↓Эх сурвалжийг нээх ↓
- An Anthropic engineer has written about the thinking linked to AI coding
- We risk ‘cognitive surrender’ if we don’t keep engaging with AI, he says
- However, the developer isn’t arguing against the use of AI coding agents
The idea that our cognitive faculties might degrade through underuse in the age of AI isn’t new, but it’s been well summed up by Anthropic engineer Addy Osmani, who says that we risk losing key skills by letting bots do all our digital work for us.
“Nothing in my day-to-day forces critical thinking on me now that so much of my work runs through agents,” writes Osmani (via Business Insider). He adds that “skills that you stop exercising are going to go away, and probably faster than you might guess”.
As you might expect given his job, the software developer isn’t suggesting that AI agents shouldn’t be used in coding projects — but he is saying that it’s important to protect our critical thinking skills, despite the temptation to simply accept everything AI offers up.
Osmani also offers a counter to the idea that it doesn’t matter if we lose the skills required for jobs that AI can do better anyway: “Regardless of how much AI helped, a human has to take responsibility,” he says.
Maintaining human ownership
https://t.co/2gyp2ErpxxNovember 3, 2026
Some level of cognitive offloading to AI is okay, Osmani argues, as long as human beings are still “maintaining ownership”. It’s when AI’s output is accepted without checks and without any rigorous examination that we should start to be worried.
“You read the last answer well, so you skim the next one,” explains Osmani. “You just scan the skeleton of the one after that. Then you get asked about a line and can’t explain it, even with your agent’s help… that’s how cognitive debt accumulates.”
The engineer has some suggestions about avoiding cognitive surrender. They include practising core skills, formulating ideas before asking AI, paying attention to what’s generated, and making sure you understand the decisions AI has made.
Ultimately, while some skills will be lost as AI improves, we need to be deliberate in terms of those we’re willing to let go, Osmani says — and not just let it happen without thinking. It’s well worth considering the next time you ask for AI’s help with something.
