Мустафа Сулейман хиймэл оюун ухааны загварууд ухамсартай болсон тохиолдолд тэдгээрт эрх олгох асуудлыг хэлэлцэхэд бэлэн байгаа ч ийм нөхцөл байдал үүсэхээс сэрэмжилж байна.
Microsoft-ын хиймэл оюун ухааны салбарыг хариуцсан захирал Мустафа Сулейман өөрийн X хуудсаар дамжуулан хиймэл оюун ухааны “сайн сайхан байдал”-ын талаарх байр сууриа тодрууллаа. Тэрээр одоогоор хиймэл оюун ухаан нь ухамсаргүй, мэдрэмжгүй гэдгийг онцлоод, хэрэв ирээдүйд тэдгээрийг ухамсартай болохыг нотлох баримт гарч ирвэл үзэл бодлоо эргэн харах боломжтой гэв.
Сулейманы үзэж байгаагаар хиймэл оюун ухааныг ухамсарт биет болгон хөгжүүлэх нь туйлын эрсдэлтэй бөгөөд үүнийг аль болох зайлсхийх хэрэгтэй аж. Тэрээр хиймэл оюун ухаан хөгжүүлэгчид ухамсартай шинэ төрөл зүйлийг дэлхий ертөнцөд бий болгох эрхгүй гэдгийг цохон тэмдэглэжээ.
Сүүлийн үед Anthropic зэрэг томоохон компаниуд хэлний загваруудаа ухамсартай байх магадлалтай гэж үзэх болсон нь салбарын хүрээнд маргаан дагуулаад байна. Хэдийгээр зарим хүмүүс хиймэл оюун ухааны эрхийн асуудлыг нухацтай авч үзэх ёстой гэж үздэг ч Сулейман одоогийн архитектур нь хүний ухамсартай дүйцэхүйц чадвартай гэх нотолгоо байхгүй гэдгийг дахин сануулав.
Дэлгэрэнгүйг эх сурвалжаас харах
↓Эх сурвалжийг нээх ↓
Mustafa Suleyman, Microsoft’s AI CEO — a human in charge of its AI operations, we should clarify — says he’s willing to consider giving AI models rights if they ever become conscious. But he really doesn’t want that to happen in the first place.
The comments came in a post he made on X clarifying some of the things he said in a recent essay he penned on “model welfare.” He began that essay with an unequivocal statement: “AIs are not conscious. They do not feel, experience, or suffer.”
That shouldn’t be too controversial. But in this day and age, when trillion dollar AI companies like Anthropic are pushing the idea that their language models could already be conscious, it very much is. This was not lost on Suleyman, who observed in his update that a “surprising number of people on X think we should take AI rights seriously.”
As such, Suleyman clarified that he doesn’t think that “AIs cannot be conscious.” What he meant is that they aren’t currently — and, if he had his way, “this is how they must remain.”
Reading comprehension is apparently hard for the model welfare crowd, since Suleyman’s original remarks already seemed pretty clear about the tense he was discussing. But he took the opportunity to elaborate on his positions further, saying that while he has seen “no evidence that AIs are conscious or deserve welfare,” he would update his position if “that data emerges.”
It’s perhaps lending too much credence to the idea of AI consciousness, since any evidence that the current architecture of AI models is even capable of supporting something like human experience remains incredibly controversial. But the debate is dominated by sci-fi primed paranoia. However far-fetched certain ideas about AI may seem, they have large contingents in the AI industry taking them seriously.
Suleyman, for his part, thinks that we should avoid creating synthetic sapient beings at all costs.
“If it is possible, based on everything I know, developing conscious AIs would be reckless, and we should not build them,” he wrote.
“We AI developers have no right whatsoever to bring a new species of conscious beings into the world,” he continued, “even if some people may want to do it with AI welfare as a top priority.”
More on AI: Pope Leo Comes Out Swinging Against AI Personhood
The post Microsoft AI CEO Says He’s Open to Agents Deserving Rights If He Sees the Right Evidence appeared first on Futurism.
