Их Британийн хууль сахиулах байгууллага Олон улсын эрүүгийн шүүхийн (ОУЭШ) ерөнхий прокурор Карим Ханыг бэлгийн дарамт үзүүлсэн хэрэгт холбогдуулан хуульчийн үйл ажиллагаа явуулах эрхийг нь түдгэлзүүлэх шийдвэрээ хэвээр үлдээлээ.
ОУЭШ-ийн ерөнхий прокурор Карим Хан өөрт нь холбогдох ёс зүйн зөрчлийн асуудлаар мөрдөн шалгах ажиллагаа дуусах хүртэл энэхүү хязгаарлалтад өртөж байна. Британийн Барын стандартын зөвлөл өнгөрсөн долоо хоногт болсон сонсголын дараа уг шийдвэрийг баталсан бөгөөд ОУЭШ-ийн удирдах байгууллага энэ сард болох тусгай хуралдаанаар түүнийг албан тушаалаас нь чөлөөлөх эсэхийг эцэслэн шийдвэрлэх юм. Карим Хан өөрт нь тулгарсан буруутгалыг эрс үгүйсгэж байна.
Энэхүү үйл явдалтай зэрэгцэн АНУ-ын засаг захиргаа ОУЭШ-ийн эсрэг чиглэсэн томоохон ажиллагаа эхлүүлснээ зарлалаа. АНУ-ын Төрийн нарийн бичгийн дарга Марко Рубио тус шүүхийг АНУ-ын бүрэн эрхэд заналхийлж байна хэмээн мэдэгдэж, гишүүн орнуудыг ОУЭШ-ээс гарахыг уриалж, шүүхийн ажилтнуудад хориг тавих болон АНУ руу нэвтрэхийг хориглох арга хэмжээ авахаа мэдэгдэв.
ОУЭШ нь дайны гэмт хэрэг, хүн төрөлхтний эсрэг гэмт хэрэг, геноцид зэрэг ноцтой асуудлыг шийдвэрлэх зорилготой байгууллага юм. АНУ-ын зүгээс ОУЭШ-ийн ажилтнуудын эсрэг авч буй хориг арга хэмжээ нь тэдний санхүүгийн үйлчилгээ болон өдөр тутмын амьдралд хүндрэл учруулж байгаа тул Европын холбоо уг үйлдлийг эсэргүүцэж, шүүхийн үйл ажиллагааг тасралтгүй үргэлжлүүлэхэд дэмжлэг үзүүлэхээ илэрхийллээ.
Дэлгэрэнгүйг эх сурвалжаас харах
↓Эх сурвалжийг нээх ↓
Britain’s legal watchdog announced on Tuesday that it has upheld a suspension for the International Criminal Court’s embattled chief prosecutor over allegations of sexual misconduct, banning him from practicing law in his home country.
The global court’s oversight body votes later this month on whether to remove Karim Khan from office. The 56-year-old faces allegations related to a female aide, a scandal that has dragged on for more than two years. He has denied wrongdoing.
In June, the U.K.’s Bar Standards Board suspended Khan, a measure adopted “in very serious and urgent cases,” according to the regulator, following a complaint. After a hearing last week, the bar association upheld the decision while disciplinary proceedings are underway.
cookie.trim() === ‘__DEBUG__=true’)) { console.log(‘Ad logs: “mpu1”, injectedAtParagraph: 3’); }]]>
Khan’s lawyers did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday.
It comes as the ICC faces increasing threats from the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump, which has long criticized the court. The ICC was created to be a last resort for pursuing the most serious international crimes: war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide and aggression.
The U.S. seeks to ‘dismantle’ the ICC
On Monday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the U.S. was launching a “sweeping campaign to dismantle the threat posed by the International Criminal Court to U.S. sovereignty.”
Rubio said he will pressure the court’s 125 member states to withdraw from the institution, sanction organizations that work with the court and ban staff from traveling to the United States. Countries that “enjoy the benefits of the U.S. security umbrella” will be called upon to reject the court’s jurisdiction over U.S. citizens.
cookie.trim() === ‘__DEBUG__=true’)) { console.log(‘Ad logs: “taboola-carousel-thumbnails”, injectedAtParagraph: 6’); }]]>
Trump’s administration already has brought sanctions against Khan and a dozen other ICC staff in retaliation for warrants the court has issued for top Israeli officials over the war in Gaza and investigations into U.S. personnel in Afghanistan.
The Rome Statute, which created the ICC in 2002, gives the court jurisdiction over crimes that happen on the territory of member states or that are committed by nationals of member states. The U.S. signed the treaty but did not ratify it.
cookie.trim() === ‘__DEBUG__=true’)) { console.log(‘Ad logs: “mpu2”, injectedAtParagraph: 8’); }]]>
The European Union condemned the new U.S. announcement. “We are already facilitating all appropriate measures, including diplomatic, legal and financial avenues, that could help ensure the continuity of the ICC’s operations,” European Commission spokesperson Siobhan McGarry told reporters.
The sanctions have hit the court hard. Typically reserved for autocrats and crime bosses, sanctions can be devastating. They prevent the ICC officials and their families from entering the U.S., block their access to even basic financial services and extend to the minutiae of their everyday lives.
cookie.trim() === ‘__DEBUG__=true’)) { console.log(‘Ad logs: “mpu3”, injectedAtParagraph: 10’); }]]>
A final decision on Khan is expected this month
The decision on Khan’s fate is now up to the Assembly of States Parties, the body that oversees the ICC, which will hold a special session on July 24 at the United Nations headquarters in New York.
Days before the British sanction, the executive committee of the ICC’s oversight body concluded that Khan had committed serious misconduct and recommended that he be removed from office.
The allegations against Khan were first reported to the court’s independent watchdog. An Associated Press investigation revealed that Khan was alleged to have seen the woman working in another ICC department and moved her into his office. She later became a regular presence on official trips, according to whistleblower documents.
On one foreign trip, Khan allegedly asked her to rest with him on a hotel bed and then “sexually touched her,” the documents said. Other alleged nonconsensual behavior cited in the documents included locking the door of his office and sticking his hand in her pocket. He also allegedly asked her several times to accompany him on a vacation.
___
Associated Press writer Lorne Cook in Brussels contributed.
