Калифорни мужид гаргасан нэхэмжлэлд тус компанийн ундаанууд нь 100 хувь байгалийн гаралтай гэсэн сурталчилгаа нь худал болохыг дурдсан байна.
AriZona Beverages компанид холбогдох энэхүү нэхэмжлэлийг тавдугаар сард Калифорни мужийн шүүхэд гаргажээ. Нэхэмжлэгчдийн зүгээс тус компанийн үйлдвэрлэдэг мөстэй цай болон жимсний коктейль нь “100% натурал” эсвэл “Бүгд байгалийн гаралтай” гэсэн шошготой боловч найрлагадаа нимбэгийн хүчил, эрдэнэшишийн сироп зэрэг синтетик бодис агуулдаг гэж буруутгаж байна. Нэхэмжлэлд дурдсанаар, компани нь борлуулалтаа нэмэгдүүлэх, бүтээгдэхүүний үнийг өсгөх зорилгоор хэрэглэгчдийг төөрөгдүүлсэн сурталчилгаа явуулсан гэжээ.
Нэхэмжлэгч Дэвид Форд болон Иветт Арчила нар хэрэв тус бүтээгдэхүүнүүдийг синтетик найрлагатай гэдгийг мэдсэн бол сүүлийн дөрвөн жилийн хугацаанд худалдан авахгүй байх байсан гэдгээ илэрхийлсэн байна. Уг хэрэгт Blueberry White Tea, Black & White Tea, ногоон цай, мөн Fruit Punch, Mucho Mango зэрэг олон төрлийн ундааг хамруулжээ. Нэхэмжлэгч тал тус компаниас хохирлыг барагдуулж, худал сурталчилгааны үйл ажиллагааг зогсоохыг шаардаж байна.
Үүнтэй төстэй хэргийг 2022 оны арванхоёрдугаар сард Томас Иглесиас гэгч иргэн мөн гаргаж байсан юм. Тус хэргийг хянан шийдвэрлэсэн АНУ-ын дүүргийн шүүгч Жеффри С.Уайт 2025 оны наймдугаар сард AriZona компанийн талд шийдвэр гаргажээ. Шүүгч дүгнэлтдээ, нэхэмжлэгч нь тус бүтээгдэхүүнийг синтетик найрлагатай гэдгийг мэдэж байсан ч худалдан авалтаа үргэлжлүүлсээр байсныг онцолсон байна.
Дэлгэрэнгүйг эх сурвалжаас харах
↓Эх сурвалжийг нээх ↓
The company behind AriZona Iced Tea has been sued over claims its drinks are “100% Natural.”
The proposed class action lawsuit filed in California in May alleges that AriZona falsely advertised its lines of iced teas and fruit juice cocktails as “100% Natural” and “All Natural,” respectively, despite the products containing synthetic ingredients such as citric acid and high fructose corn syrup.
The lawsuit claims that consumers have become “increasingly concerned about the effects of synthetic and chemical ingredients” and that the company intentionally marketed its products as natural “to increase sales and command a price premium.”
While prices on certain AriZona drinks can vary, its Iced Tea has remained at 99 cents a can since it first hit the market in the early 1990s.
The lawsuit argues that plaintiffs David Ford and Ivette Archila would not have regularly purchased AriZona drinks in California for at least the past four years if they had known they contained synthetic ingredients.
“Plaintiffs paid more for the Products, and would only have been willing to pay less, or unwilling to purchase them at all absent the false and misleading labeling complained of herein,” read the lawsuit, which Top Class Actions first reported.
The Independent has reached out to AriZona and the plaintiffs’ attorney for comment.
Ford and Archila seek to represent a class of people in California who bought AriZona products listed in the complaint for personal or household use at any time from four years before the lawsuit was filed through the date a class is notified.
The teas included in the complaint are Blueberry White Tea, Black & White Tea, Iced Tea with Lemon Flavor, Iced Tea with Peach Flavor, Real Brewed Sweet Tea, and Green Tea with Ginseng and Honey.
The fruit juices included are Fruit Punch, Mucho Mango, Watermelon, Kiwi Strawberry, and Pineapple Fruit Juice Cocktails.
The lawsuit also asks for an order requiring AriZona to pay restitution and end its alleged unfair business practices.
Last summer, a federal judge ruled in favor of AriZona in a similar false advertising lawsuit.
In December 2022, plaintiff Thomas Iglesias argued in a class action complaint that the company misled its customers into believing its drinks were “All Natural” or “100% Natural.”
US District Judge Jeffrey S. White ruled in August 2025 that Iglesias had formed the belief that AriZona drinks were misleading by 2021, but that he continued to purchase them in 2022.
“In other words, armed with the belief that Arizona Beverages contained synthetic ingredients or preservatives, Iglesias did not modify his behavior,” White wrote in an order first reported by the Courthouse News Service.
