Гоо сайхны салбар дахь хэт туйлширсан чиг хандлага эрүүл мэндэд эрсдэл учруулж байна

I recently read about a new trend where men are having fillers injected into their scrotums to make themselves more attractive. Some, trying to save money, turn to unlicensed beauty therapists. Others go even further and inject hyaluronic acid themselves at home and, as a result, they sometimes lose the very thing they were trying to improve.

Admittedly, the problem is still more common in the United States, but even here we already have dancers and performers who regularly fill that area with whatever they can get their hands on, apparently in the hope of impressing women.

To put it bluntly, there are plenty of questions, such as who is supposed to find an enlarged scrotum attractive? I can at least understand men who use fillers to increase the size of their penis, although that procedure raises enough questions of its own, but has anyone ever met a woman who chooses a man based on the size of his scrotum? The most he is likely to achieve is to surprise her.

It’s an interesting phenomenon because as recently as 30 years ago, people suffering from body-image problems had very few tools with which to “improve” themselves. The most accessible option was flamboyant clothing, and even that only really became available during perestroika for Russians.

Soviet citizens who were dissatisfied with their appearance had far fewer ways of “boosting their attractiveness” and men had practically none. A man who looked too extravagant risked attracting the attention of the authorities, while women with body-image issues often took up sewing or knitting and made their own unusual, custom-made clothes. People in the 1980s had few other means of changing their appearance as even dyeing one’s hair a bright color was difficult and could attract unwanted attention.

In the 1990s, clothes and tattoos were added to the repertoire and later came tanning salons, followed by piercings. People began appearing with rings in their noses and eyebrows and then came cheek piercings and stretched earlobes, but relatively few people went too far with piercings and, from a medical point of view, the damage was usually limited.

Until fairly recently, people who were constantly dissatisfied with themselves had little opportunity to mutilate themselves because the tools simply weren’t available.

Cosmetology had little to offer them either and before eyebrow and lip tattooing became widespread, there were few truly radical procedures. One of the more shocking treatments popular with earlier generations was a scorching peel, in which the skin was effectively burned away and, later, chemical peels became available and the industry expanded rapidly.

Then came permanent make-up, silicone breast implants, silicone lip filler and hyaluronic acid as new techniques appeared, allowing fillers to be injected into the cheekbones and forehead, and then thread lifts emerged, along with many other procedures capable of producing irreversible consequences. And that’s before we even get to plastic surgery.

For some time now, life has become especially difficult for vulnerable people who are dissatisfied with themselves, their lives and their careers as they are overwhelmed by the demand to demonstrate success, to appear permanently desirable and to radiate sexual energy 24 hours a day.

The vast pseudo-beauty industry preys on such people as it sells them the idea of endless self-improvement and because competition within the industry is fierce, the procedures it offers become increasingly radical so “self-improvement” gradually turns into monstrification.

Lips become bigger and bigger and cheekbones become wider and sharper, while the removal of Bichat fat pads produces a bare-skull facial contour, and many of these “improvements” are difficult or impossible to reverse, while some lead to serious health problems.

A gangrenous scrotum or facial fibrosis caused by a thread lift isn’t even the worst possible outcome because fillers can migrate and block blood vessels, tissues can stretch permanently and nerves can be damaged. People can lose both their appearance and their health in the pursuit of an invented ideal, but, at the same time, the pressure on insecure and dissatisfied people is increasing.

In the past, they saw role models mainly on television or in fashion magazines, but today they constantly compare themselves with perfect faces and bodies in advertising, social media and the accounts of boastful, insincere bloggers.

They see beautiful, successful, heavily edited people living in large, lavishly furnished apartments, owning country houses with perfect lawns and driving expensive cars.

Now there is also artificial intelligence and neural networks generate images of perfect women and handsome men that are sometimes impossible to distinguish from real people. The hypothetical Ellen is now forced to compete not only with Hollywood stars, but with artificial ideals.

The real world around Ellenis full of ordinary people, overweight, tired, with sallow skin, thin lips, crooked legs and bad shoes, but the pressure from the media has become so great that the average person no longer compares herself withthose walking beside her in the street but with faces on billboards and images on the internet.

“No,” Ellen tells herself after watching a hundred videos featuring beautiful and wealthy people. “I want to be there, inside that beautiful picture. I’m not one of those scruffy losers dragging themselves along in faux-leather sandals.”

The dissatisfaction created by failing to match the group of rich and beautiful people with whom the average person identifies gradually turns into self-loathing and then every available means of conforming to the ideal is brought into play, and the more money such a person has, the wider the range of bodily alterations available.

When I see faces standardized by fillers and plastic surgery, worn out by fibrosis and stretched tissue, I understand that I am looking at victims of dissatisfaction with themselves and their lives. These are people who have decided that the problem lies not in their competence, education, personality or lack of natural charm, but in the shape of their nose or the fullness of their lips.

Most importantly, this now affects both sexes. Until recently, it was mainly women who sought to improve their appearance, but, as the philosopher Jean Baudrillard once observed, in order to sell beauty products to men, men first had to be taught to think like women about their bodies.

Men also watch pornography, and artificial intelligence has entered that world too, so, as a result, what the viewer sees on the screen may bear little resemblance to what he sees in his own trouser and this is frustrating.

A man may not have a girlfriend because he is dull or simply unattractive, but instead he decides that the real problem is a small scrotum, whereas female viewers blame their lack of success on unattractive breasts or a “wrong” vagina.

And off they go as the man enlarges his scrotum, unaware that somewhere his potential partner is having hyaluronic acid injected into her labia, and both believe this is how they will achieve happiness and recognition.

Of course, people need protection from the immense pressure of marketing and forced consumption, especially when it threatens their health, but the beauty industry has learned to monetize dissatisfaction with extraordinary efficiency. It invents new defects and then sells the cure, and when men have begun injecting fillers into their scrotums in pursuit of perfection, it is clear that the process has gone much too far.

This article was first published by the online newspaperGazeta.ruand was translated and edited by the RT team