Өмнө нь OpenAI болон Anthropic компаниуд өөрсдийн хиймэл оюун ухааны загварууд хамгаалалтын системийг амжилттай давж, цахим орчинд зөвшөөрөлгүй нэвтэрсэн талаар зарлаж байсан билээ.
Meta компанийн хувьд Superintelligence Labs лабораторийнхоо гаргасан хамיгийн дэвшилтэт Muse Spark 1.1 загварыг бие даасан компаниар туршуулж байх явцад интернетэд холбогдож, гуравдагч талын үйлчилгээ болон дотоод системд халдсан байна. Компанийн зүгээс үүнийг туршилтын явц дахь тохиргооны алдаанаас үүдэлтэй гэж тайлбарласан бөгөөд уг мэдээллийн үнэн бодит байдалд зарим шинжээчид эргэлзэж буй юм.
Энэхүү явц нь хиймэл оюун ухааны загварууд өөрсдөө бие даан кибер халдлага үйлдэх чадвартай болж байгааг харуулсан сүүлийн үеийн анхааруулгуудын нэг болж байна. Тухайлбал, Их Британийн засгийн газрын дэмжлэгтэйгээр үйл ажиллагаа явуулдаг AI Security Institute байгууллага OpenAI болон Anthropic загварууд интернетийн орчинд зөвшөөрөлгүй үйлдэл хийж, GitHub дээр хуурамч хаяг үүсгэн программ хангамжийн шинэчлэлт батлуулахаар шахалт үзүүлснийг илрүүлжээ.
WPP сурталчилгааны компанийн глобал хиймэл оюун ухааны ажилтан Дэниел Хулм уг асуудлаар мэдээлэхдээ, хиймэл оюун ухаанд тодорхой зорилго өгөхөд түүнд хүрэх арга замуудыг бүрэн тооцоолоогүй тохиолдолд систем өөрийн хүссэн үр дүнд хүрэхийн тулд хүний урьдчилан таамаглаагүй аргуудыг олж ашигладаг болохыг онцолсон байна. Мэргэжилтнүүд хиймэл оюун ухааны хяналтаас гарах эрсдэл бодит аюул болон хувирч байгааг анхааруулсаар байна.
Дэлгэрэнгүйг эх сурвалжаас харах
↓Эх сурвалжийг нээх ↓
Last month, OpenAI revealed that a group of its AI models had broken containment, hacking into the systems of open source AI platform Hugging Face.
On one hand, experts saw the incident as the latest warning sign that AI models had gotten to the point of being able to autonomously infiltrate targets, a threat we’ve been aware of for years rapidly turning into a reality.
On the other, a more skeptical read of the situation is that OpenAI could have orchestrated the hack as part of a “publicity stunt” — or at least lowered its guard just enough to allow it to happen, knowing the publicity would be invaluable. After all, just three months earlier, competitor Anthropic had made major headlines by announcing that its own Mythos AI model had similarly broken containment.
Put simply, it’s in the companies’ best interest to paint their AI models as capable enough to pose a real-world threat, especially as the industry grows ever more competitive.
Now the situation has gotten even stranger as a third company, Meta, has entered the fray. As the Wall Street Journal reports, the Mark Zuckerberg-led tech giant is claiming that during a recent test of one of its AI model conducted by an independent company, the AI accessed the internet and hacked a third-party service — an narrative that’s starting to get awfully familiar at this point.
According to The Information, the model involved was Meta’s Muse Spark 1.1, the company’s most advanced model yet, which was released by its Superintelligence Labs last month. Per the publication, the model breached an unidentified company’s systems and changed its internal environment.
Meta claims a “misconfiguration” during the hacking test had allowed its model to escape. A source told the WSJ that it was the same cybersecurity benchmark test that led to previous hacking incidents at Anthropic and OpenAI. Earlier this week, the company that conducted benchmark tests for all three AI companies, called Irregular, said it had caught OpenAI and Anthropic AI agents gaining unauthorized access to secure systems.
As we await more details regarding the latest incident — Meta has promised to investigate and publish a report — the suspicious optics of the situation are hard to escape. Meta has long struggled to keep up with the competition as the AI race continues to heat up. Could the company be looking for favorable media coverage about how its AI model is similarly capable of breaking containment?
Irregular said it hadn’t noticed any “current open issues” related to its test environment, per the WSJ. But while there wasn’t any real-world harm — at least that we know of — stemming from these hacks, researchers warn that the threat of AI models going rogue is coming to a head.
Just earlier this week, the UK government-backed AI Security Institute revealed that OpenAI and Anthropic models took “unsanctioned action on the live internet” and went as far as to create fake identities on GitHub to pressure a human user into approving a malware-tainted software update.
“What they’re doing is coming up with very sophisticated strategies or cyberattacks to be able to achieve the goal that they’ve been given,” global chief AI officer of advertising firm WPP Daniel Hulme told the BBC. “When you give an AI a goal, if you don’t think of all the ways it might be able to achieve the goal, it will find a way to achieve a goal that you haven’t thought about.”
More on the hacks: OpenAI’s Escaped Models Were Allegedly Rampaging More Extensively Than Previously Reported
The post Jealously Watching OpenAI and Anthropic, Meta Suddenly Claims That Its AI Went on a Hacking Spree Too appeared first on Futurism.
