Иллинойсын их сургуулийн эргэн ирсэн гол тоглогчид болон NBA-ийн оддын тоглолтын арга барил, бие бялдрын ижил төстэй байдлыг шинжлэн үзлээ.
Дэвид Мирковичийг Жулиус Рандлтай харьцуулж байна. Тэд хоёулаа бие бялдрын хувьд ижил төстэй бөгөөд будагтай талбай дотор хүчтэй тоглолт үзүүлж, самбараас бөмбөг авалтаар давамгайлдаг. Тэдний аль аль нь гурван онооны шидэлтийг амжилттай гүйцэтгэх чадвартай төдийгүй талбай дээр тоглолт зохион байгуулах өндөр IQ-тэй тоглогчид юм.
Звонимир Ивишийн хувьд Мо Бамбатай төстэй шинж чанартай. Тэд өндөр нуруу, урт гарынхаа тусламжтайгаар хамгаалалтад хаалт хийхдээ гарамгай бөгөөд гурван онооны шидэлтээр өрсөлдөгчөө талбайн гаднаас довтлоход хүргэдэг. Томислав Ивишийн тоглолтын хэв маяг Никола Вучевичийг санагдуулдаг бөгөөд тэд хоёулаа “пик-энд-поп” буюу хамгаалагчийн дэлгэц хийж шидэлт гүйцэтгэх тактикийг түлхүү ашигладаг.
Андрей Стояковичын тоглолтыг ДеМар ДеРозантай зүйрлэж байна. Тэд хоёулаа тоглолтын төгсгөлд бөмбөг эзэмшиж, ганцаарчилсан ур чадвар болон тэсрэлттэй хурдаараа оноо авах чадвартай. Мөн тэд агаарт биеэ удирдах чадвар сайтай бөгөөд хүнд нөхцөлөөс оноо авахдаа гарамгай юм.
Жэйк Дэвис бол Шэйн Баттиертай ижил “цавуу” тоглогч буюу багийнхаа дутагдлыг нөхдөг тоглогч юм. Тэрээр өндөр IQ, хамгаалалтын байрлал эзлэх чадвараараа ялгардаг бөгөөд булангаас гурван онооны шидэлтийг тун өндөр хувьтай гүйцэтгэдэг. Тэрээр өнгөрсөн улиралд 40.6 хувийн амжилттай гурван онооны шидэлт гүйцэтгэсэн үзүүлэлттэй байна.
Дэлгэрэнгүй эх сурвалжийг харах
Эх сурвалжийг нээх ↓
We’re deep in the offseason. A summer of hype around new recruits and NBA Draft anticipation has now become quiet. To pass time, let’s take a look at the Illini’s returning core and their closest NBA comparisons.
David Mirkovic: Julius Randle
Mirkovic and Randle are almost identical when it comes to their body frames, with Mirk sitting at 6-foot-9 and 250 pounds and Randle at 6-foot-8 and 250. The similarities are also seen in what they do with their bodies: they both love to play bully-ball. With both of them lacking elite verticals above the rim, they instead utilize their frames to fight through contact, dominate the glass and get buckets at the rim.

Julius Randle combines the bully-ball aspect of his game with his ability to knock down shots from the perimeter, making 33% of his 3-point shots throughout his career. David Mirkovic does the same, stretching defenses out to the arc to contest his triples when it isn’t working for him in the paint. Mirk shot 37.5% from long-range last season, attempting around four per game. Randle also attempted around four per game last season. Obviously, neither is a spot-up shooter, but they both pose a scoring threat from the paint and the perimeter.
Both of them are primarily power forwards, but they both can act as point forwards. Randle occasionally initiates the offense from the perimeter and is able to grab a defensive rebound and push coast-to-coast. Mirkovic’s background as a point guard gives him similar traits, and they both possess high IQ and passing vision as power forwards.

Additionally, they both use their physicality to excel at grabbing rebounds. Julius Randle career rebounds per game sit at 8.9, and Mirkovic snagged 8 per game in his freshman season.
Zvonimir Ivisic: Mo Bamba
Frame-wise, Z and Mo are both freakishly lengthy. Zvonimir sits at 7-foot-2 and around 245-250 pounds, and Bamba at 7-foot and 230. But that’s not where the swatting abilities come from. Zvonimir Ivisic’s wingspan is speculated to be around 7-foot-5 or greater, and Mo Bamba’s 7-foot-10 wingspan is one of the largest ever recorded at the NBA Draft combine.

As basketball players, they both primarily thrive at one thing: protecting the rim. They excel with their timing, reflexes and length to reject shots around the cylinder. Bamba has swatted roughly 6.5% of two-point attempts while on the floor throughout his NBA career, and Z’s 12.6% block rate ranked No. 4 nationally last season.
Beyond rim protection, they both carry themselves as stretch 5s on offense, spacing the floor by offering a 3-point threat from the wing and forcing bigs to leave the paint. Bamba’s career 3-point percentage sits at 35%, while Zvonimir has made 33.6% of his triples so far throughout his NCAA career.
Neither of them are seen posting-up in the paint often, but they still score in the interior by catching lobs, running the floor in transition and crashing the boards for putback dunks.

Tomislav Ivisic: Nikola Vucevic
Tomislav Ivisic and Nikola Vucevic’s styles of play are practically the same. The one thing setting them apart is the height difference: Tomislav’s 7-foot-1 frame towers over Vuc’s 6-foot-9 frame.

Still, they score in the same ways. They both love a good pick-and-pop at the top of the key to offer a shot option and make space for guards in the lane. And when they’re given the ball there, they’ll knock down most of their triples from the top of the key. Vucevic has made 35% of his career triple attempts, and Tomislav 32% in his Illini career. Last season, Tomislav attempted 4.7 3-pointers per game while Vucevic attempted 4.2 per game.
If the long-range shots aren’t going down, the pick-and-pop can turn into a pick-and-roll, but with a short roll. They both like to open themselves up to the free throw line for a floater instead of fighting through contact in the paint.

Even though they don’t usually invite contact, they both possess shifty skills in the post for interior scoring and rely on their footwork, fakes, hook shots and creativity.
Beyond scoring, these two centers love to playmake from the elbow and utilize their vision to find cutters.
Andrej Stojakovic: DeMar DeRozan
DeMar and Andrej are both 6-foot-6, though DeMar’s 220 pounds is a little heavier than Stojakovic’s 205.
One thing they’re both unusually skilled at is relieving pressure late in the shot clock. They like to demand the ball at the perimeter, then use their isolation skills and explosive athleticism to bail their team out for a layup or midrange.

That same explosive athleticism helps them soar in the air vertically. DeMar recorded a 38.5-inch vertical at the 2009 NBA Draft combine, while Andrej recorded a 41.5-inch vertical in this year’s combine. That bounce gives both of them the ability to finish violently and posterize players in the paint, as Stojakovic did multiple times last season and DeMar did frequently in his Raptor years.
Their body control allows them to finish off a lot of tough buckets in the mid-paint. Both take, and make, tough layups, floaters and short pull-ups while adjusting their bodies midair.
Most of their scoring comes from these types of buckets, along with midrange shots closer to the arc and free throws from fouls drawn. Stojakovic was more comfortable knocking down the triple in his first two collegiate years than his first season as an Illini. At Stanford and Cal, he averaged 3.8 3-point attempts per game and made 32.2% of them. Last season, he only took 2.4 3-pointers per game and made just 24.4% of them.

DeRozan on the other hand, attempted just 1.7 3-pointers per game and shot 28.8% from behind the arc during his nine seasons as a Toronto Raptor. As a Chicago Bull and Sacramento King, DeRozan attempted 2.4 3-pointers per game and made 33% of them.
They both have the capability to knock down the triple, but cannot always find the rhythm.
Jake Davis: Shane Battier
Battier has two inches and 10 pounds on Jake Davis, but they play almost identically. Both glue guys use their high basketball IQ and positioning to slide into help defense, take charges and close out on shots on one side of the court, and cut backdoor and make the extra pass on the other.

Beyond their intelligence on the court, their hustle and grit don’t always show up on the box score. They both box out, crash the glass and fight for loose balls relentlessly through toughness.
Lastly, but certainly not least, they’re both primarily known for one thing: knocking down the catch-and-shoot corner triple and being absolutely elite at it. Davis shot 40.6% from behind the arc last season, knocking down 54 out of his 133 attempts. In the 2012-13 season with the Miami Heat, Shane Battier shot 43% from 3-point range, nailing 103 of his 276 attempts.

TCR readers, do you agree or disagree with these comparisons? Offer your own in the comments below!

