Дэлхийн физикчдийн дунд явуулсан томоохон санал асуулга нь орчин үеийн физикийн суурь ойлголтуудын талаар нэгдсэн шийдэлд хүрээгүй байгааг харууллаа.
Перриметрийн хүрээлэнгийн эрдэмтэн Нияеш Афшорди болон түүний баг АНУ-ын Физикийн нийгэмлэгийн “Physics Magazine” сэтгүүлтэй хамтран физикчдийн дунд өргөн хүрээтэй судалгаа явуулжээ. Судалгаагаар хар нүх, харанхуй матер, квант механик болон таталцлын онолыг нэгтгэх зэрэг орчин үеийн физикийн гол асуудлуудад эрдэмтдийн дийлэнх нь санал нэгдэж чадаагүй байна. Тухайлбал, сансар судлалын үндсэн загвар болох ΛCDM (Lambda Cold Dark Matter) загварыг судалгаанд оролцогчдын олонх нь дэмжээгүй нь саяхан DESI багажаар илрүүлсэн харанхуй энергийн хувьсалтай холбоотой байж болох юм.
Судалгаанд хамрагдсан олон асуултаас ердөө хоёр нь л дийлэнх санал авчээ. Тухайлбал, оролцогчдын 68 хувь нь “Их тэсрэлт” (Big Bang) нь цаг хугацааны эхлэл гэхээсээ илүүтэйгээр орчлон ертөнц маш халуун, нягт төлөвөөс хэрхэн хөгжсөнийг тодорхойлдог онол гэдэгтэй санал нэгдсэн байна. Мөн 51 хувь нь эртний орчлон ертөнц маш хурдацтай тэлэх “инфляци”-ийн үеийг дайрч өнгөрсөн гэдэгтэй санал нийлжээ.
Харин харанхуй матер болон квант таталцлын онолын хувьд эрдэмтэд олон талтай байр суурьтай байна. Тухайлбал, харанхуй материйн мөн чанарыг тайлбарлахдаа судалгаанд оролцогчдын 21 хувь нь олон таамаглалын нэгдлийг дэмжсэн бол 19 хувь нь утасны онолыг (string theory) хамгийн магадлалтай шийдэл гэж үзжээ.
Нияеш Афшорди энэхүү санал зөрөлдөөнийг шинжлэх ухааны бүтэлгүйтэл гэхээсээ илүүтэйгээр шинэ нээлт хийх боломж гэж харж байна. Санал нэгдэхгүй байгаа нь судалгааны салбарт илүү нарийвчлалтай өгөгдөл, шинэ онол, эсвэл салбар хоорондын шинэлэг холбоос хэрэгтэй байгааг илтгэж буй ажээ. Энэхүү судалгааны дэлгэрэнгүй үр дүнг “Physics Magazine” сэтгүүлд нийтэлсэн байна.
Дэлгэрэнгүйг эх сурвалжаас харах
↓Эх сурвалжийг нээх ↓
The largest global survey of physicists ever conducted has revealed just how unsettled some of the biggest questions in modern physics remain. Researchers found surprisingly little agreement on topics ranging from black holes and dark matter to the long-running effort to reconcile Einstein’s theory of gravity with quantum mechanics.
Even the standard model of cosmology, known as ΛCDM (Lambda Cold Dark Matter), failed to win support from a majority of respondents. That result may reflect recent findings from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), which suggested that dark energy could change over time. Such a possibility would conflict with the standard model, which assumes that dark energy remains constant.
And cosmology was far from the only area where physicists disagreed.
Standard Answers Fail To Win Broad Support
“The most striking result is how few of the ‘standard answers’ in fundamental physics command overwhelming support, with most falling short of a majority. The interesting point is not that physicists are confused. It is that the frontier is genuinely alive,” says Niayesh Afshordi, associate faculty member at Perimeter Institute and professor at the University of Waterloo.
Afshordi led the study with coauthor Phil Harper and the American Physical Society’s Physics Magazine.
Across the questions included in the survey, only two received majority agreement.
One concerned the Big Bang. Despite the way it is often portrayed in popular culture, 68% of the physicists surveyed said the Big Bang does not necessarily represent the beginning of time. Instead, the theory describes how the universe developed from an extremely hot and dense state. It does not, by itself, explain whether time had an absolute beginning.
The second point to cross the majority threshold was cosmic inflation. Just 51% agreed that the early universe experienced an extremely rapid period of expansion known as inflation.
Dark Matter Remains Wide Open
On many other major questions, the responses were much more divided.
Dark matter is one example. Only 17% favored the idea that dark matter is made of a yet undiscovered low-mass particle or particles. Another 12% supported modifications to the theory of gravity. The largest single group, at 21%, favored some combination of the many proposed explanations.
That spread of responses highlights how little consensus exists around one of the central mysteries of modern cosmology.
No Clear Winner for Quantum Gravity
Physicists were similarly divided over quantum gravity, the effort to develop a theory that can describe gravity within the framework of quantum mechanics.
String theory received the most support, but only 19% of respondents selected it as the most likely solution. Loop quantum gravity received 12%, while 18% favored the possibility that gravity cannot be quantized at all.
The result shows that even after decades of theoretical work, no single approach has emerged as the dominant answer.
Why Disagreement Could Be Good for Physics
So what does such widespread disagreement mean for the future of the field? Afshordi sees the lack of consensus as a sign of opportunity rather than failure.
“Scientific truth is not decided by a vote. But consensus, or its absence, tells us where the evidence feels settled and where researchers still see room for radically different ideas. In this sense, lack of consensus can be a clue. It marks places where better data, sharper theory, or new connections between subfields may be needed. In the eternal words of the Canadian singer and songwriter, Leonard Cohen: ‘There is a crack in everything, that’s how the light gets in.'”
Rather than suggesting that physicists have lost their way, the findings point to areas where major discoveries may still be possible. Some of the most fundamental questions about the universe remain open, leaving room for new observations, stronger theories, and unexpected ideas to reshape our understanding.
The survey results are described in an article published in Physics Magazine. An online dashboard also allows readers to explore the responses in greater detail.
