АНУ-ын улс төрийн нөлөө бүхий зүтгэлтэн Чарли Киркийг хөнөөсөн хэрэгт буруутгагдаж буй Тайлер Робинсоны шүүх хурал Юта мужийн дөрөвдүгээр тойргийн шүүхэд болж байна.
Шүүх хурлын явцад прокурорууд сэжигтэн Тайлер Робинсоны хамтран амьдрагч Лэнс Твиггсийн өгсөн мэдүүлгийг танилцуулжээ. Твиггсийн хэлснээр, хэрэг гарсан маргааш нь Робинсон Чарли Киркийг буудсандаа харамсаж байгаагаа илэрхийлсэн байна. Прокурорын зүгээс Робинсоныг урьдчилан төлөвлөж, улс төрийн үзэл бодлын улмаас халдлага үйлдсэн гэж үзэж байгаа бөгөөд хэрэг үйлдэхээс өмнө тэрээр “Киркийг устгах боломж гарлаа” гэсэн утга бүхий зурвас үлдээсэн гэж буруутгаж байна.
Шүүгч Тони Граф энэхүү урьдчилсан сонсголын төгсгөлд прокуроруудын цуглуулсан нотлох баримт нь хэргийг шүүх хурал руу шилжүүлэхэд хангалттай эсэхийг шийдвэрлэх юм. Хохирогчийн гэр бүлийн зүгээс шүүх ажиллагааг ил тод байлгахыг шаардаж байгаа ч шүүхээс хохирогч болон шүүгдэгчийн эрхийг хамгаалах үүднээс зарим нотлох баримтыг нууцлах байр суурьтай байна.
Мөрдөн байцаагчдын мэдээлснээр, өнгөрсөн оны есдүгээр сард Юта хөндийн их сургуульд олон мянган хүний өмнө үг хэлж байсан Чарли Киркийг ойролцоох барилгын дээврээс буудсан байна. Хэргийн газрын ойролцоо болт-экшн төрлийн винтов буу олдсон бөгөөд хамгаалалтынхан уг нотлох баримтыг ДНХ-ийн шинжилгээгээр баталгаажуулахаар ажиллаж байна. Харин өмгөөлөгчид нь ДНХ-ийн шинжилгээний үр дүнгийн найдвартай байдалд эргэлзэж байгаагаа илэрхийлжээ.
Дэлгэрэнгүйг эх сурвалжаас харах
↓Эх сурвалжийг нээх ↓
<![CDATA[{"className":"sc-1ge0fwe-0","newsletterData":{"pianoFieldName":"receiveEveningHeadlinesUSNews","regTitle":"Evening Headlines","subscriptionGroup":"us_evening_headlines","subscriptionGroupId":"4326e634-422a-4447-8e1e-604a937cd3b5","type":"daily_news","pathPrefix":["/us","/news/world/americas","/news/world/americas/crime"],"title":"The latest headlines from our reporters across the US sent straight to your inbox each weekday","mobileTitle":"Your briefing on the latest headlines from across the US","imageSrc":"https://static.independent.co.uk/static-assets/images/newsletters/usEveningHeadlines1_1.png","label":"I would like to receive morning headlines Monday – Friday plus breaking news alerts by email“,”newsletterKey”:”receiveEveningHeadlines”,”regSourceSection”:”US Crime News”,”regSourceNewsletter”:”NSC”},”isClimate”:false}]]>
The man accused of killing Charlie Kirk told his roommate-turned-lover that “he wishes he hadn’t done it” the day after Kirk was shot in the neck, according to a video interview played in a Utah court Thursday.
Lance Twiggs, who was defendant Tyler Robinson’s romantic partner and roommate, described the interaction with Robinson during a recorded interview with a prosecutor on April 20.
Defense attorneys had fought against the public release of the statements from Twiggs, saying prosecutors would characterize the statements as a confession, undermining Robinson’s right to a fair trial if the statements are broadcast by the media.
Robinson is charged with aggravated murder and has not entered a plea. He turned himself in a day after the fatal shooting of Kirk, a close ally of President Donald Trump credited with helping galvanize young voters for the Republican in the 2024 election.
Prosecutors allege Robinson confessed in a note left for Twiggs that read: “I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I’m going to take it.” Robinson also allegedly sent a text to Twiggs saying he targeted Kirk because he “had enough of his hatred.”
Twiggs spoke to authorities on Sept. 12 — two days after Kirk was assassinated while speaking to a crowd of thousands at Utah Valley University — and again on April 20. He was given immunity for the statements, meaning what Twiggs said cannot be used against him in a potential criminal case.
State District Judge Tony Graf will decide at the conclusion of this week’s preliminary hearing if prosecutors have enough evidence to bring Robinson to trial.
Robinson’s attorneys have not commented on his guilt or innocence but have sought to get the death penalty taken off the table, so far unsuccessfully.
Attorneys for the media and for Kirk’s widow, Erika, who has attended this week’s hearing, had urged the judge to make Twiggs’ statements and other evidence public.
“To not be transparent, to not be open and let the world see what happened will create doubt and distrust in the judicial system,” Kirk family lawyer Jeffrey Neiman told Graf Wednesday.
Neiman filed a request late Wednesday for all evidence against Robinson to be displayed openly and in real time during this week’s hearing. Neiman wrote that Erika Kirk and Kirk’s parents had waited 10 months for the hearing but at times have been denied the chance “to meaningfully observe” it.
The judge said in response that not all evidence would be openly displayed and he needs to protect the rights of both victims and the defendant.
Investigators say Robinson went to a rooftop near where Kirk was speaking and shot him once through the neck as the activist was taking questions from a crowd of several thousand people. Kirk was declared dead after being taken to a hospital.
Investigators found the suspected murder weapon — a bolt-action rifle with one spent round — wrapped in a towel in a wooded area near where Kirk was shot.
Robinson has sat quietly through the hearing. On Thursday, he was dressed in a jacket and tie with one arm shackled to his waist. He appeared to be taking notes with his free hand.
Robinson’s parents and two of his brothers sat behind him, in the front row of the courtroom gallery. Charlie’s Kirk parents and Erika Kirk sat a few rows back. Sen. Mike Lee, a Utah Republican, also was in attendance.
Robinson’s lawyers earlier this week questioned the reliability of DNA testing used to link the defendant to the towel and gun.
A member of Tyler Robinson’s defense team interrogated a DNA analyst from the FBI about the techniques she used to connect Robinson to the evidence. Defense lawyer Michael Burt cast doubt on the analyst’s conclusions.
“She can’t match Mr. Robinson to the questioned samples,” Burt argued.
But forensics expert Lawrence Quarino said law enforcement agencies use “extremely reliable” tests to determine the probability that a person matches with DNA found at a crime scene.
DNA testing “is the gold standard in forensic science,” said Quarino, a professor and director of the forensic science program at Cedar Crest College in Pennsylvania.
