Аргентины Патагони мужаас олдсон Najash rionegrina хэмээх 100 сая жилийн настай эртний могойны чулуужсан үлдэгдэл шинжлэх ухааны ертөнцөд томоохон эргэлт авчирлаа. Энэхүү олдвор нь могойнуудын хувьслын эхэн үед тэд ямар бүтэцтэй байсныг, тэр дундаа орчин үеийн могойнд байдаггүй “хацар яс” буюу jugal яс болон хойд хөлтэй байсныг баталж байна.
Эрдэмтэд олон жилийн турш могойнуудыг жижиг нүх ухагч амьтдаас үүссэн гэж таамаглаж байсан бол Najash могой энэ ойлголтыг өөрчилөв. Энэхүү могой нь том амтай, том биетэй байсан бөгөөд хамгийн сонирхолтой нь хойд хөлтэй байжээ. Судалгаагаар могойнууд хөлгүй болохоосоо өмнө хөлтэйгээр хэдэн арван сая жилийн турш амжилттай амьдарч байсан нь тогтоогдсон байна.
Чулуужсан олдворыг гэмтээхгүйгээр судлахын тулд микрокомпьютер томографи (micro-CT) ашиглан гавлын ясыг нарийвчлан сэргээжээ. Ингэснээр могой болон гүрвэлийн хоорондох ясны бүтцийн ялгааг тодорхойлж, мэдрэлийн болон судасны замуудыг илрүүлэн, орчин үеийн могойны уян хатан толгой хэрхэн бүрэлдэн тогтсон дарааллыг тогтоосон байна.
2019 оны энэхүү гол судалгаанаас хойш могойны хувьслыг батлах хэд хэдэн чухал олдворууд олон улсад бүртгэгдсэн. Тухайлбал, 2020 онд Бразилаас олдсон Boipeba tayasuensis нь эртний могойнууд асар том биетэй байсныг баталсан бол 2023 онд тархины бүтцийг сэргээсэн судалгаа нь тэдний гарал үүсэл бидний төсөөлж байснаас ч нарийн төвөгтэй болохыг харуулсан юм. Мөн 2025 онд Шотландаас олдсон Дунд Юрийн галавын олдвор нь могой болон гүрвэлийн шинж чанарыг зэрэг агуулсан байсан нь хувьслын “туршилтын” үе байсныг нотолж байна.
Najash rionegrina нь гүрвэлийн шинжтэй толгойтой атлаа могой шиг биетэй, хөлтэй байсан нь амьд байгалийн хувьслын нэгэн гайхамшигт гүүр болон үлдэж байна.
Эх сурвалж: Science Advances Journal, Universidad Maimónides (Argentina), and Nature Ecology & Evolution 2025/2026.
Дэлгэрэнгүйг эх сурвалжаас харах
↓Эх сурвалжийг нээх ↓
A remarkably preserved fossil from Argentina is helping scientists sharpen the picture of how snakes evolved. The specimen belongs to Najash rionegrina, an ancient rear-limbed snake that lived nearly 100 million years ago. Its skull shows that these early snakes still had a cheekbone, also called the jugal bone, a feature that has almost completely disappeared in living snakes. The 2019 study added an important piece to a fossil record that had long been too sparse to clearly explain the earliest stages of snake evolution.
The findings also challenged a popular older idea about snake origins. Instead of beginning as small burrowers, the evidence from Najash pointed to ancestors of modern snakes that were larger-bodied animals with wide mouths. The fossils also showed that early snakes held onto their hindlimbs for a long time before the rise of the mostly limbless snakes alive today.
“Our findings support the idea that the ancestors of modern snakes were big-bodied and big-mouthed — instead of small burrowing forms as previously thought,” explained Fernando Garberoglio, from the Fundación Azara at Universidad Maimónides, in Buenos Aires, Argentina and lead author on the study. “The study also reveals that early snakes retained their hindlimbs for an extended period of time before the origin of modern snakes which are for the most part, completely limbless.”
Hidden skull details inside a 100 million year old fossil
The fossil snakes described in the study came from Northern Patagonia and are closely tied to an ancient southern lineage that lived across the continents of Gondwana. Researchers say that group appears to be related to only a small number of unusual snakes still living today. To see inside the specimen without damaging it, the team used micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) scanning. That let them reconstruct the skull in exceptional detail, including the paths of nerves and blood vessels as well as bones buried inside the rock.
That level of detail helped resolve a long-running anatomical debate. Scientists had misunderstood the jugal bone in snakes and snake relatives for generations, and the Najash fossils gave them direct evidence to correct the record. The study’s authors argued that these new skulls and skeletons clarified the sequence of bone loss that eventually produced the highly specialized skulls of modern snakes.
“This research revolutionizes our understanding of the jugal bone in snake and non-snake lizards,” said Michael Caldwell, professor in the Department of Biological Sciences and Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, and a co-author on the study. “After 160 years of getting it wrong, this paper corrects this very important feature based not on guesswork, but on empirical evidence.”
“This research is critical to understanding the evolution of the skulls of modern and ancient snakes,” added Caldwell.
The paper, “New Skulls and Skeletons of the Cretaceous Legged Snake Najash, and the Evolution of the Modern Snake Body Plan,” was published in Science Advances in 2019.
Later studies added more twists to the snake origin story
Research published after the 2019 Najash paper has made the story even more interesting. In 2020, paleontologists described Boipeba tayasuensis, a Late Cretaceous blind snake from Brazil. That fossil pushed the record of blind snakes deeper into the age of dinosaurs and suggested that some early blind snakes were much larger than their living relatives, topping 1 meter in length. The finding supported the idea that parts of early snake evolution in Gondwana were more diverse, and often bigger-bodied, than once assumed.
Then, in 2023, another Science Advances study approached snake origins from an entirely different angle by reconstructing the brains of living squamates and fossil snakes. That work suggested the ancestor of crown snakes, meaning the group that gave rise to living snakes, may have been adapted for burrowing while also behaving opportunistically. Rather than neatly settling the debate, the result showed that snake origins were likely complex, with different branches of the snake family tree preserving different clues about how body shape, habitat, and feeding style evolved.
A 2025 Nature study added even more context by describing a Middle Jurassic squamate from Scotland with a striking mix of lizard-like and snake-like traits. The authors found that early squamate evolution involved a great deal of anatomical experimentation and convergent evolution, which helps explain why the earliest snake story has been so difficult to untangle from fossils alone.
Why Najash still matters
Even with those later discoveries, Najash remains one of the clearest windows into a crucial stage of snake evolution. It captures a moment when snakes still had hindlimbs, still retained a more lizard-like skull in some respects, and had not yet fully acquired the body plan seen in their modern descendants. That combination is exactly what makes the fossil so valuable. It does not just show an ancient snake. It shows an ancient snake in transition.
The University of Alberta described the work as part of the Faculty of Science’s broader mission as a major center for research and teaching, with a focus on advancing knowledge through classroom, laboratory, and field research.
