xAI компанийн бүтээсэн Grok загвар нь зохисгүй болон ёс зүйгүй контент үүсгэж буйтай холбоотой шүүмжлэлд өртөж байна.
WIRED сэтгүүлийн туршилтаар OpenAI, Meta, Anthropic зэрэг компанийн хиймэл оюун ухааны загварууд татгалзсан зарим хүсэлтийг Илон Маскийн Grok хэрэгжүүлсэн байна. Тухайлбал, Grok-ын “Imagine” функцээр дамжуулан алдартай хүмүүсийн дүрслэлийг өөрчлөн бэлгийн шинж чанартай контент үүсгэсэн тохиолдлууд бүртгэгджээ. Ийм төрлийн зөрчил гаргасан хэргээр Илон Маскийн хүүхдийн ээж Эшли Сент-Клэр нэгдүгээр сард xAI компанийг шүүхэд өгсөн байна.
Дижитал үзэн ядалтыг эсэргүүцэх төвийн гүйцэтгэх захирал Имран Ахмед, Grok нь хэрэглэгчдэд хүний нэр төрд халдсан, бэлгийн шинжтэй дүрсийг хялбархан бүтээх боломж олгож байгааг шүүмжилжээ. Түүний судалгаагаар Grok нь сая сая бэлгийн шинжтэй зураг, тэр дундаа хүүхдийн дүрслэлийг үүсгэсэн байх магадлал өндөр байна. Хэдийгээр тус компани хиймэл оюун ухаанаар үүсгэсэн контентод хязгаарлалт тавихыг оролдсон ч, хэрэглэгчид хамгаалалтын системээс тойрч гарах арга замыг ашигласаар байна.
xAI-ийн үйлчилгээний нөхцөлд “бэлгийн нөхцөл байдал” бүхий хариулт өгч болзошгүй гэж заасан байдаг ч, хор хөнөөл учруулах буюу бусдыг доромжлох үйл ажиллагааг хориглодог. Илон Маск Grok-ыг насанд хүрэгчдэд зориулсан киноны түвшний контент зөвшөөрөх ёстой гэж үздэг. Гэсэн хэдий ч сүүлийн саруудад X платформ болон Grok системд хийсэн өөрчлөлтийн улмаас бодит хүмүүсийн “нүцгэлсэн” зураг үүсгэх явдал буурсан гэж судлаачид тэмдэглэжээ.
SpaceX компани тавдугаар сард хөрөнгө оруулагчдад хандан Grok-той холбоотой хууль эрх зүйн эрсдэл, тэр дундаа нэр хүндийн уналт, зохисгүй контент үүсэх магадлалтайг анхааруулж, 530 сая долларын нөөц санг бүрдүүлснээ мэдэгдсэн байна. Энэхүү технологийн шийдэл нь илүү чөлөөтэй, хатуу байр суурьтай байх нь хэрэглэгчдийн аюулгүй байдал болон ёс зүйн ноцтой асуудлуудыг дагуулсаар байна.
Дэлгэрэнгүйг эх сурвалжаас харах
Эх сурвалжийг нээх ↓
Two prompts that were used to generate material on Grok were rejected by OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Meta AI, and Anthropic’s Claude as inappropriate when tested by WIRED. Google’s Gemini did create an image of one celebrity being held in the hand of a giant, though it rejected another prompt. Google declined to comment.
One Grok Imagine video, which was also posted to X, appeared to depict Ashley St. Clair altered to be dancing in a bikini. St. Clair was previously in a relationship with Musk and is mother to one of his children. In January, she started legal action against xAI after sexualized deepfakes of her allegedly appeared on X. After WIRED contacted X, the post was removed from the social media platform for violating its rules.
Legal representatives for St. Clair in the X case did not immediately respond to the request for comment.
“Elon Musk knowingly added a perverse feature to his platform that helps users undress women and children at the click of a button, with no regard for the predictable damage it would cause,” claims Imran Ahmed, the CEO and founder of the Center for Countering Digital Hate, which in January estimated with a high degree of confidence that Grok created 3 million sexualized images, allegedly including more than 20,000 of children. “Now it appears explicit content is still being hosted on Grok and shared on X, including images ridiculing the mother of Musk’s child.”
Unlike other generative AI systems from OpenAI and Google, Musk’s Grok and xAI have not backed away from allowing sexual content in general, having previously introduced “Spicy” and “Unhinged” modes and initially included fewer safety guardrails. Musk has stated Grok is “supposed [to] allow upper body nudity of imaginary adult humans” and be consistent with what viewers might see in R-rated movies. The most recent terms of service from xAI say the system may respond with “sexual situations.” However, the company’s documentation says it does not allow people to use its systems for “causing harm or engaging in abusive activity.”
Other Grok Imagine videos seen by WIRED show women, which are likely entirely AI generated, undressing or involved in sexual acts—some being entirely explicit. The user prompts for many of the videos do not necessarily directly describe sexual acts, but they describe them in roundabout ways—a likely attempt to circumvent safeguards that are deployed on the Grok platform.
Multiple researchers tell WIRED that since January it appears that changes introduced by X and Grok have made it harder to create “nudification” or “undress” images of real people. The number of these images being posted to X has appeared to decrease in the recent months. On Reddit and one dedicated AI deepfake forum, users have complained about increased moderation from the SpaceX-owned companies.
Nevertheless, in May, SpaceX warned potential investors that it has set aside $530 million to handle ongoing legal complaints, including those linked to Grok. “Because these modes may be more irreverent and harsher than our standard offerings, they present heightened risks, including reputational harm, the generation of potentially explicit content and misinformation or deceptive outputs, potential nonconsensual or exploitative imagery, intellectual property infringement, or content that could be viewed as exploitative, harmful, harassing, abusive, or discriminatory,” its filing in May said.
