Математикийн салбарт томоохон нээлт хийснээ зарласан OpenAI компанийн мэдэгдэл олон нийтийн дунд маргаан дагуулаад байна.
OpenAI компани өөрийн хиймэл оюун ухааны систем нь математикийн “Мянганы шагналт” бодлогуудад багтдаг Navier-Stokes-ийн тэгшитгэлийг шийдвэрлэсэн тухай мягмар гарагт мэдээлсэн юм. Уг бодлого нь шингэн болон хийн хөдөлгөөнийг тодорхойлдог бөгөөд шийдлийг нь олсон тохиолдолд Clay Mathematics Institute-ээс нэг сая ам.долларын шагнал олгодог. Тус компани 10,000 орчим хиймэл оюун ухааны агент 88 цагийн турш 130 тэрбум гаруй токен ашиглан тооцоолол хийж, компьютерээр баталгаажсан шийдлийг гаргаж авсан гэв.
Гэвч мэргэжлийн судлаачид уг амжилтыг бодитой эсэхэд эргэлзэж байна. Нью-Йоркийн их сургуулийн математикч Тристан Бакмастер OpenAI-ийг бусад судлаачдын хийж буй ажлыг ажигласны дараа их хэмжээний нөөц ашиглан өрсөлдөж, нээлтийг өөрийн болгосон гэж буруутгав. Мөн зарим шинжээчид үүнийг хиймэл оюун ухааны технологийн үнэлгээг өсгөх, хувьцаагаа олон нийтэд гаргахын өмнөх сурталчилгааны хэрэгсэл хэмээн үзэж байна.
OpenAI компани гаднын судлаачдын ахиц дэвшлийн талаарх цуу яриаг сонссоныхоо дараа уг төслийг эхлүүлснээ хүлээн зөвшөөрсөн боловч тэдний нийтлэгдээгүй бүтээлийг ашиглаагүй гэж мэдэгдлээ. Гэсэн хэдий ч тус компани өөрсдийн бүтээгдэхүүнийг ашиглаж буй хэрэглэгчдийн нэргүй мэдээлэл загваруудаа сайжруулахад нөлөөлсөн байхыг үгүйсгэхгүй байгаа юм. Математикчид уг баталгааг бие даан шалгах хүртэл эцсийн дүгнэлт хийхээс болгоомжилж байна.
Дэлгэрэнгүйг эх сурвалжаас харах
↓Эх сурвалжийг нээх ↓
The company says its internal AI has solved the famous Navier-Stokes Millennium Prize problem
OpenAI has come under fire after claiming its AI solved one of mathematics’ most famous problems. Researchers are raising questions over how the company arrived at the breakthrough, while others are accusing it of exaggerating the achievement to boost valuation ahead of a potential IPO.
The company announced on Tuesday that an internal AI system had solved the Navier-Stokes problem, one of mathematics’ famous Millennium Prize questions. It concerns equations describing how liquids and gases move and asks whether the math can suddenly break down under certain conditions. A correct solution carries a $1 million prize from the Clay Mathematics Institute.
OpenAI said around 10,000 AI agents worked on the problem for roughly 88 hours, exchanging millions of messages and generating around 130 billion output tokens before producing a computer-verified proof.
The company says the result satisfies the official wording of the prize problem, although it does not intend to claim the money. It also presented the feat as evidence of how rapidly its internal AI systems are advancing.
The announcement has drawn mixed reactions, with some calling it an “exciting day for mathematics” while others have raised suspicions of plagiarism and questioned the significance of the achievement.
NYU mathematician Tristan Buckmaster has accused OpenAI of throwing massive resources at the problem only after learning that he and Anthropic researcher Levent Alpöge were making progress on a related approach.
Mathematicians have also cautioned against declaring the problem solved before the proof is independently examined. Diego Cordoba, whose work helped pioneer the approach used by the AI, said a valid solution would be a “big surprise.”
Others have been far more critical. Prominent tech commentator Mehdi, who has a large following on X, opened a lengthy attack on the announcement by telling OpenAI CEO Sam Altman to “go f**k yourself,” before accusing the company of trying to “privatize the very mechanism of human knowledge.”
Mehdi argued that OpenAI had tackled an easier version of the problem and used brute-force computing rather than genuine machine reasoning or scientific intuition.
He suggested that the supposed breakthrough was achieved by thousands of AI agents simply searching mathematical ground already explored by human researchers in order to manufacture an artificial “Sputnik moment” to boost excitement around its technology and inflate its valuation ahead of a stock-market listing.
OpenAI has acknowledged that the project began after hearing rumors that outside mathematicians had made progress on related problems but has denied accessing their unpublished work. At the same time, it said it could not rule out that anonymized data from their use of OpenAI products had helped improve its models.
You can share this story on social media:
